<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Azzcat Design Makeover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/azzcat-design-makeover/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/azzcat-design-makeover</link>
	<description>Design stories &#38; tips, peppered with life&#039;s little tidbits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:10:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/azzcat-design-makeover/comment-page-1#comment-1580</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/?p=1275#comment-1580</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Ash. :)
Noted on the Pill subheads. I&#039;ll point it out to Typekit. They&#039;re constantly improving font hinting.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Ash. :)
Noted on the Pill subheads. I&#8217;ll point it out to Typekit. They&#8217;re constantly improving font hinting.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash Menon</title>
		<link>http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/azzcat-design-makeover/comment-page-1#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash Menon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/?p=1275#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Catherine, love the makeover. Especially the dancing boxes :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just like to point out, that in Chrome (Windows), the footer&#039;s subheaders (Pill Gothic font, I believe?) appears pixelated and broken slightly.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Catherine, love the makeover. Especially the dancing boxes :)</p>

<p>Just like to point out, that in Chrome (Windows), the footer&#8217;s subheaders (Pill Gothic font, I believe?) appears pixelated and broken slightly.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/azzcat-design-makeover/comment-page-1#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 02:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/?p=1275#comment-729</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No worries! I&#039;ve made my peace with the browser differences. (Not easy for an old print designer!) Though I&#039;m frustrated by the browser differences, the &#039;game&#039; of CSS keeps me smiling. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries! I&#8217;ve made my peace with the browser differences. (Not easy for an old print designer!) Though I&#8217;m frustrated by the browser differences, the &#8216;game&#8217; of CSS keeps me smiling. ;-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph McCullough</title>
		<link>http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/azzcat-design-makeover/comment-page-1#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph McCullough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 02:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/?p=1275#comment-728</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your reply! &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Call it coding practices or laziness, I just can&#039;t imagine my page looking different on different browsers. What I really  can&#039;t imagine is  having to take care of multiple CSS files or conditional CSS statements. That just seems like it would be a nightmare to manage. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I guess I just play it safe way too much! &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your reply! </p>

<p>Call it coding practices or laziness, I just can&#8217;t imagine my page looking different on different browsers. What I really  can&#8217;t imagine is  having to take care of multiple CSS files or conditional CSS statements. That just seems like it would be a nightmare to manage. </p>

<p>I guess I just play it safe way too much! </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/azzcat-design-makeover/comment-page-1#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 01:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/?p=1275#comment-726</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Joseph!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Typekit has no effect on SEO. The text is all there in HTML and if Typekit fails, there&#039;s fallback font stacks. What&#039;s especially great about Typekit is that the text is totally under control of CSS and is selectable. (Though admittedly, my  elements aren&#039;t easy to grab!) Cufon, for instance, does not fully support CSS rules.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CSS3 is still a little tricky. Turned out that Windows FF couldn&#039;t handle the alpha transparency gradients in the nav bar and footer. So I found a script that let me isolate Windows FF to serve up a solid color for those elements. So frustrating!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;IE7 &amp; 8 (I don&#039;t support IE6) had issues rendering the Wufoo contact form. Fortunately, Wufoo offers javascript OR iframe alternative. The iframe works across IE, FF, Chrome &amp; Safari, whereas the javascript didn&#039;t work in IE. So I used the iframe.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bottom line...lots of trial and error. The site looks luscious in Chrome/Safari/FF on Mac. Windows...meh. There&#039;s a world of difference in font-hinting between Mac &amp; Windows. (I have no idea of how Linux looks!)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Joseph!</p>

<p>Typekit has no effect on SEO. The text is all there in HTML and if Typekit fails, there&#8217;s fallback font stacks. What&#8217;s especially great about Typekit is that the text is totally under control of CSS and is selectable. (Though admittedly, my  elements aren&#8217;t easy to grab!) Cufon, for instance, does not fully support CSS rules.</p>

<p>CSS3 is still a little tricky. Turned out that Windows FF couldn&#8217;t handle the alpha transparency gradients in the nav bar and footer. So I found a script that let me isolate Windows FF to serve up a solid color for those elements. So frustrating!</p>

<p>IE7 &amp; 8 (I don&#8217;t support IE6) had issues rendering the Wufoo contact form. Fortunately, Wufoo offers javascript OR iframe alternative. The iframe works across IE, FF, Chrome &amp; Safari, whereas the javascript didn&#8217;t work in IE. So I used the iframe.</p>

<p>Bottom line&#8230;lots of trial and error. The site looks luscious in Chrome/Safari/FF on Mac. Windows&#8230;meh. There&#8217;s a world of difference in font-hinting between Mac &amp; Windows. (I have no idea of how Linux looks!)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph McCullough</title>
		<link>http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/azzcat-design-makeover/comment-page-1#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph McCullough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/?p=1275#comment-724</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Looks pretty nice. I&#039;m not a big fan of the scattered rounded rectangles, but that&#039;s just me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been tempted to test out TypeKit. Do you know if it has any negative effects on SEO?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m going to be redesigning my site/blog also. Unfortunately it won&#039;t look nearly as good as this one! &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m also reluctant to shift to CSS3. I mean i&#039;m all for Bashing IE6, but I feel like I should still keep IE7 and 8 in mind. Maybe I&#039;ll break that mind set eventually.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Good luck with everything!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks pretty nice. I&#8217;m not a big fan of the scattered rounded rectangles, but that&#8217;s just me.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ve been tempted to test out TypeKit. Do you know if it has any negative effects on SEO?</p>

<p>I&#8217;m going to be redesigning my site/blog also. Unfortunately it won&#8217;t look nearly as good as this one! </p>

<p>I&#8217;m also reluctant to shift to CSS3. I mean i&#8217;m all for Bashing IE6, but I feel like I should still keep IE7 and 8 in mind. Maybe I&#8217;ll break that mind set eventually.</p>

<p>Good luck with everything!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Azzcat Design Makeover -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/azzcat-design-makeover/comment-page-1#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Azzcat Design Makeover -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 23:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/?p=1275#comment-722</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Catherine Azzarello, Codrops. Codrops said: RT @azzcatdesign: Azzcat Blast:: Azzcat Design Makeover http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/azzcat-design-makeover [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Catherine Azzarello, Codrops. Codrops said: RT @azzcatdesign: Azzcat Blast:: Azzcat Design Makeover <a href="http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/azzcat-design-makeover" rel="nofollow">http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/azzcat-design-makeover</a> [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/14 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 613/616 objects using disk: basic

Served from: azzcatdesign.com @ 2012-02-07 04:48:36 -->
