<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS Validation—Why It Matters (or Not)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/css-validation%e2%80%94why-it-matters-or-not/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/css-validation%e2%80%94why-it-matters-or-not</link>
	<description>Design stories &#38; tips, peppered with life&#039;s little tidbits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:53:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McCorkell</title>
		<link>http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/css-validation%e2%80%94why-it-matters-or-not/comment-page-1#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McCorkell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/?p=834#comment-546</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When you get that &quot;green light&quot; frm W3C you do feel like you got a good mark on your homework. But when it comes to CSS... it is pretty unreliable now. Anyone that boasts &quot;Valid CSS&quot; now just isn&#039;t using progressive enhancement.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Obviously we should aim to write flawless CSS anyway, but that dam validator needs to catch up with the sorcery that is CSS3. :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you get that &#8220;green light&#8221; frm W3C you do feel like you got a good mark on your homework. But when it comes to CSS&#8230; it is pretty unreliable now. Anyone that boasts &#8220;Valid CSS&#8221; now just isn&#8217;t using progressive enhancement.</p>

<p>Obviously we should aim to write flawless CSS anyway, but that dam validator needs to catch up with the sorcery that is CSS3. <img src='http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/css-validation%e2%80%94why-it-matters-or-not/comment-page-1#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/?p=834#comment-488</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I like that fuzzy feeling, too! Problem is I&#039;m working in HTML5 and since that isn&#039;t official yet, neither is the validation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do double-check within Coda as I go for validity issues--ignoring the HTML5 warning. (Are you listening, Panic/Coda?) The only other time I ignore the HTML validator is for 3rd party embedding, like YouTube and affiliate links. They&#039;ve almost always got some issue that I&#039;m not likely to resolve. So as long as they display across major browsers, I let those errors go.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that fuzzy feeling, too! Problem is I&#8217;m working in HTML5 and since that isn&#8217;t official yet, neither is the validation.</p>

<p>I do double-check within Coda as I go for validity issues&#8211;ignoring the HTML5 warning. (Are you listening, Panic/Coda?) The only other time I ignore the HTML validator is for 3rd party embedding, like YouTube and affiliate links. They&#8217;ve almost always got some issue that I&#8217;m not likely to resolve. So as long as they display across major browsers, I let those errors go.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph McCullough</title>
		<link>http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/web-design/css-validation%e2%80%94why-it-matters-or-not/comment-page-1#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph McCullough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azzcatdesign.com/blog/?p=834#comment-487</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I honestly haven&#039;t found a need to tap in to the new CSS techniques, but that&#039;s probably because I&#039;ve only been in the game half a year. Generally CSS Validation doesn&#039;t help me fix my problems. The HTML validation, however, I believe is a godsend. I don&#039;t know how much of the HTML Validator I&#039;d allow myself to ignore. I validate everything I make (except the blog) strict. Probably for nothing more than the fuzzy feeling of seeing the green box that says &quot;Congratulations!&quot;. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly haven&#8217;t found a need to tap in to the new CSS techniques, but that&#8217;s probably because I&#8217;ve only been in the game half a year. Generally CSS Validation doesn&#8217;t help me fix my problems. The HTML validation, however, I believe is a godsend. I don&#8217;t know how much of the HTML Validator I&#8217;d allow myself to ignore. I validate everything I make (except the blog) strict. Probably for nothing more than the fuzzy feeling of seeing the green box that says &#8220;Congratulations!&#8221;. </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
